I was reading an article about white teachers recently. The author was listing various issues that are facing education as students become more diverse but our teaching force remains largely white. I thought the author made some really interesting points but one issue she brought up in a few different ways is that white teachers shouldn't ask their black friends or co-workers questions regarding issues of race.
I found a similar train of thought on a short Buzzfeed video about sexuality. They cut back and forth between various folks giving commentary on their experience within their subgroup. There was one individual who seemed to have a chip on their shoulder. This person was constantly rolling their eyes in respect to anyone who did not understand the various sub-categories. When asked about what it means to be gender fluid, the person scoffed, "I am so sick of answering that question!"
These are just two examples of an attitude and perspective I feel I have run into dozens of times in the past year. I teach, so I understand the feeling of impatience that can arise from answering the same question over and over... particularly when you feel something has already been explained or should be self-evident.
However, I am concerned that - just when our country is hitting a stride of listening, probing, and looking to be educated, the door is being slammed in many questioning faces. If you think no one is really listening or questioning, consider how the issues of race, sexuality, and feminism were discussed through most of the 20th century.
I am a middle-aged white dude. My experience with being a minority is pretty thin. My insights are vicarious. As a teacher, I work mostly with women (I am the only male teacher on my staff). A good chunk of my friend circle is gay. I spent 8 years working at a school where 95 percent of my students were non-white.
I was raised in a highly conservative environment. I cringe when I think of the various sexist, homophobic, and racist things that have come out of my mouth and attitude over the decades. If it were not for the exposures and experiences I listed above, I would probably still consider a lot of that bad thinking to be acceptable. It was through conversations with people different than me that my thoughts have begun to change.
I am an atheist. I was an evangelical for 30 years, so I know from experience the wrong-headed ideas a lot of religious folks have about me. Those ideas they have will continue to spin as long as their only thoughts about atheists are what they tell each other. If one wants to understand the atheist experience, don't ask a believer, ask an atheist.
If you are in any kind of minority group, I would hope you could be patient with answering questions and sharing your experience. There is no one better equipped to share your story than you. If change is going to happen, it will be because of more conversations, not less.
Showing posts with label Homosexuality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Homosexuality. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 14, 2018
Monday, June 04, 2018
America That Was
A few years ago, my son (14) and I watched the mini-series "11/22/63". In the story, James Franco goes back in time in an attempt to stop the Kennedy assassination.
There are a number of scenes that depict the racism and sexism of the time. In one instance, a black woman runs out of gas and walks 12 blocks to a service station. The attendant refuses to service her and points her to a station a mile away that will serve "her kind".
My son was taken aback by these scenes. He could not wrap his head around such blatant inhumanity.
It reminded me of a conversation he and I had a few years earlier. Utah's 10th court was deciding whether gay marriage would be allowed in our state. There was a leader from the LDS church on the radio stating why the church stood against gay marriage. My son was concerned about how this would affect friends of ours who had been married in a state that honored gay marriages. He asked me, "What does the church want? For them to get a divorce?"
I envy the clarity and openness my children have on these issues. I did not start to work on things like equality until I was in my 30s. Even now, approaching 50, I find I am still digging out roots of bad thinking. For my kids, seeing clearer on issues of race, gender, and equality seems so much more second nature.
My kids give me hope for a better future. We will need it because many Americans have forgotten where we came from. They seem eager to undo our progress and send us back to a time when it was acceptable to point to a sign and say, "We don't serve your kind here!"
There are a number of scenes that depict the racism and sexism of the time. In one instance, a black woman runs out of gas and walks 12 blocks to a service station. The attendant refuses to service her and points her to a station a mile away that will serve "her kind".
My son was taken aback by these scenes. He could not wrap his head around such blatant inhumanity.
It reminded me of a conversation he and I had a few years earlier. Utah's 10th court was deciding whether gay marriage would be allowed in our state. There was a leader from the LDS church on the radio stating why the church stood against gay marriage. My son was concerned about how this would affect friends of ours who had been married in a state that honored gay marriages. He asked me, "What does the church want? For them to get a divorce?"
I envy the clarity and openness my children have on these issues. I did not start to work on things like equality until I was in my 30s. Even now, approaching 50, I find I am still digging out roots of bad thinking. For my kids, seeing clearer on issues of race, gender, and equality seems so much more second nature.
My kids give me hope for a better future. We will need it because many Americans have forgotten where we came from. They seem eager to undo our progress and send us back to a time when it was acceptable to point to a sign and say, "We don't serve your kind here!"
Saturday, June 02, 2018
Full Disclosure: I Am Racist
A regular complaint I hear from some of my fellow white people on Facebook is that they are sick of being called racist. They often make this complaint between their posts about the Confederate flag and various derogatory observations concerning black people and Mexicans.
My first thought is that, in general, I am not accused of being a racist. I won't say it has never happened but it is not so frequent that I have put it on my list of topics to refute. So, if this is something you are feeling a little singled out about, you might want to consider that maybe underneath all of your annoyance with the accusation, you are just reacting negatively to a fair description.
Second, I don't think this is an accusation one should run from. I don't. I am racist.
I am also bigoted, homophobic, sexist, and an ageist. There is hardly a week that goes by where I do not unfairly categorize someone. I often do not give individuals proper respect based on some prejudicial notion swimming around in my head. The truth is I give favor to the people who most resemble me and suspicion to those least like me.
Now I don't beat myself up over this too much. Evolution has developed us as pattern makers and conditioned us to be tribal. It is our default setting. However, natural is not always best. Many recovery programs list admitting you have a problem as paramount. I admit I am all these things... because I don't want to be any of them.
It would be arrogance to deny these states of being in my life. What? Would I really think a little enlightenment given to me over the years would change century upon century of societal inertia? Would having a gay or black friend uproot all the paths of thinking that were laid out for me before I was even born?
So if you find yourself being annoyed at being called racist, I have news for you - it's true. But don't lose hope, now you know- and as we learned from G.I. Joe, "Knowing is half the battle". What you do with that knowledge will determine how you tend to be known.
My first thought is that, in general, I am not accused of being a racist. I won't say it has never happened but it is not so frequent that I have put it on my list of topics to refute. So, if this is something you are feeling a little singled out about, you might want to consider that maybe underneath all of your annoyance with the accusation, you are just reacting negatively to a fair description.
Second, I don't think this is an accusation one should run from. I don't. I am racist.
I am also bigoted, homophobic, sexist, and an ageist. There is hardly a week that goes by where I do not unfairly categorize someone. I often do not give individuals proper respect based on some prejudicial notion swimming around in my head. The truth is I give favor to the people who most resemble me and suspicion to those least like me.
Now I don't beat myself up over this too much. Evolution has developed us as pattern makers and conditioned us to be tribal. It is our default setting. However, natural is not always best. Many recovery programs list admitting you have a problem as paramount. I admit I am all these things... because I don't want to be any of them.
It would be arrogance to deny these states of being in my life. What? Would I really think a little enlightenment given to me over the years would change century upon century of societal inertia? Would having a gay or black friend uproot all the paths of thinking that were laid out for me before I was even born?
So if you find yourself being annoyed at being called racist, I have news for you - it's true. But don't lose hope, now you know- and as we learned from G.I. Joe, "Knowing is half the battle". What you do with that knowledge will determine how you tend to be known.
Sunday, October 18, 2015
Facebook Faith #55 - Christian Munchausen Syndrome
There has been a lot said in the media, particularly the conservative media, about Christian persecution. If you listen to Fox News, or the various Republican presidential candidates, you would get the impression that Christians are under attack in America.
However, when you dig past the rhetoric, you often find that how they use the word persecution tends to differ from the definition most of us use.
For example, I was reading a Facebook post regarding Al Mohler's (president of the Southern Baptists) comments that Christians should not attend the weddings of their gay family and friends. A Christian blogger posted in the comments section that Christians would be insulted by being asked to attend in the first place. The following is part of our discussion.
I know a lot of the push back to this would be that David has an extreme view and that he does not represent most of Christendom. Honestly, I don't know what the numbers are like. I know Christians of all stripes on this topic.
But here is what I do know: There are Christian mayors who think like David. There are Christian governors who think like David. There are many Christians in Congress who think like David.
Nearly all of the the Republican presidential candidates think like David.
The religious powers in the Dark Ages thought like David and much of the pain and suffering in the Middle East is being caused by religious people who think like David.
We all need to fear religion that considers the existence of the "other" an insult and a slap in the face.
However, when you dig past the rhetoric, you often find that how they use the word persecution tends to differ from the definition most of us use.
For example, I was reading a Facebook post regarding Al Mohler's (president of the Southern Baptists) comments that Christians should not attend the weddings of their gay family and friends. A Christian blogger posted in the comments section that Christians would be insulted by being asked to attend in the first place. The following is part of our discussion.
I know a lot of the push back to this would be that David has an extreme view and that he does not represent most of Christendom. Honestly, I don't know what the numbers are like. I know Christians of all stripes on this topic.
But here is what I do know: There are Christian mayors who think like David. There are Christian governors who think like David. There are many Christians in Congress who think like David.
Nearly all of the the Republican presidential candidates think like David.
The religious powers in the Dark Ages thought like David and much of the pain and suffering in the Middle East is being caused by religious people who think like David.
We all need to fear religion that considers the existence of the "other" an insult and a slap in the face.
Tuesday, September 01, 2015
Religious Tantrums
So what to do about Kim Davis? By now, dozens of excellent articles have been written about her hypocrisy and inconsistency when trying to apply biblical injunctions. These things are easily discerned by everyone outside the knuckle dragging end of jingoistic Christianity.
However, what accommodations, if any, should society make for religious conviction? For the most part - I say none. I agree with the direction of the meme. This man has a personal conviction concerning pork and HE navigates its burdens.
When Ultra-Orthodox Jews refuse to sit next to women on planes, and hold up flights with their tantrums, they are expecting everyone else to shoulder the burden of their conviction. When Kim Davis refuses to issue marriage licences, she is insisting that others carry her load.
If the Ultra-Orthodox Jew is so convicted, let him buy a 2nd seat. If Kim Davis cannot execute the full scale of her duties, she should move to employment where she can.
Instead, these religious folks throw a tantrum. Rather than doing the heavy lifting themselves, they lay the weight of their issues on to the backs of others.
We control our disdain when toddlers act this way... after all, they are only toddlers. Adults should get no such considerations.
However, what accommodations, if any, should society make for religious conviction? For the most part - I say none. I agree with the direction of the meme. This man has a personal conviction concerning pork and HE navigates its burdens.
When Ultra-Orthodox Jews refuse to sit next to women on planes, and hold up flights with their tantrums, they are expecting everyone else to shoulder the burden of their conviction. When Kim Davis refuses to issue marriage licences, she is insisting that others carry her load.
If the Ultra-Orthodox Jew is so convicted, let him buy a 2nd seat. If Kim Davis cannot execute the full scale of her duties, she should move to employment where she can.
Instead, these religious folks throw a tantrum. Rather than doing the heavy lifting themselves, they lay the weight of their issues on to the backs of others.
We control our disdain when toddlers act this way... after all, they are only toddlers. Adults should get no such considerations.
Saturday, June 27, 2015
Facebook Faith #52: Supreme Court High Five!
![]() |
Turning on the computer - June 26, 2015 |
I was, of course, happy with yesterday's ruling and it was great to see all of the celebrating going on. I was also surprised to see normally conservative folks coming out of the woodwork to back the SCOTUS on this one.
The video of S.E. Cupp on CNN was particularly interesting to me. Not only was I unaware that she was so passionate about gay rights, but it again demonstrated the rift in the GOP. Going to The Blaze to read a write up about that interview, I was taken aback at how viciously the commentors spoke of her. She was not a fellow republican with a different opinion, she was a @#$%! Reading those reactions, and then seeing Governors like Jindal declare that they will do everything they can to resist the SCOTUS on this.... I realized we will not see another Republican president until there is a split in the party. Old school Republicans see these new Republicans, who are more inclusive, as the enemy.
Then there was the pastor from Texas who said he would set himself on fire if gays got the right to marry. He quickly recanted once the court ruling became known.
No one really wanted this guy to set himself on fire. However, his hyperbolic reaction is indicative of typical Religious Right behavior. Everything is always extreme, oh no the sky is falling - the world is ending, kind of responses.
The reality is, despite yesterday's events, the sun rose and life went on. I have no hope the Religious Right will ever learn to behave differently. They have been over-reacting and the world has been coming to an end since I was a little kid. They will never change. The only thing you can do is leave... which I did.
This picture from Salt Lake shows the polar ways this ruling is viewed. The Deseret News, owned by the LDS church, wonders how we go on, in an America that allows gays the same rights as everyone else. The Tribune sees yesterday as an important, historic day.
While most of the nation celebrates, the Religious Right are planning their next strategy. Some are calling for revolution, both violent and non-violent. Others are encouraging each other to just hold their nose and try to be polite so they can demonstrate how good they are as religious people.
So much drama over something that has almost zero impact on any of them.
Sunday, February 22, 2015
Facebook Faith # 46: Heresy Is A Beautiful Thing!
The following is a conversation I had on Facebook recently. A friend had brought up her concerns with Rob Bell's recent comments concerning the Bible and Homosexuality. I put in my two cents that I thought Bell was being a little misunderstood. That probably would have been the end of my commentary, but an old church mate jumped in with her two cents implying Bell was a heretic.
I find the topic of heresy fascinating. Most of the greatest souls our world has ever known were regarded as heretics by the religious powers of their time. They advanced science, philosophy, human rights, and even religion... all while being derided by the protectors of orthodoxy.
Given that, it amazes me that we cannot seem to learn the folly of using the charge of heresy to shut down ideas and close up our ears. No, like EF below, Orthodoxy is real and must be defended... it "is a matter of life and death." It never occurs to her that it might just be a little too convenient that, out of the myriad of voices out there claiming Orthodoxy, hers just happens to be the right one! Well, not hers... it's "God's". :)
Anyway, below is the tennis match between EF and me. My friend JL jumps in and adeptly shows an example of what I am confident are MANY cherry pickings of scripture on EF's part. As I discovered in my many years in church circles, NO ONE cherry picks scripture from the bible more than the person who says they don't cherry pick scripture. :)
Here it is:
I find the topic of heresy fascinating. Most of the greatest souls our world has ever known were regarded as heretics by the religious powers of their time. They advanced science, philosophy, human rights, and even religion... all while being derided by the protectors of orthodoxy.
Given that, it amazes me that we cannot seem to learn the folly of using the charge of heresy to shut down ideas and close up our ears. No, like EF below, Orthodoxy is real and must be defended... it "is a matter of life and death." It never occurs to her that it might just be a little too convenient that, out of the myriad of voices out there claiming Orthodoxy, hers just happens to be the right one! Well, not hers... it's "God's". :)
Anyway, below is the tennis match between EF and me. My friend JL jumps in and adeptly shows an example of what I am confident are MANY cherry pickings of scripture on EF's part. As I discovered in my many years in church circles, NO ONE cherry picks scripture from the bible more than the person who says they don't cherry pick scripture. :)
Here it is:
- Andrew Hackman Not that I am a defender of Bell, but I think his point was not that HE felt those letters were irrelevant... but using those letters to others, and that is one's only reasoning, is not going to make much impact. Anymore than someone quoting the Book of Mormon to an Evangelical as a reason one should or should not do this or that. The average Evangelical would just roll their eyes and say, "Why do I care what the Book of Mormon says?" Likewise would be the reaction of a non-Christian with the Bible.
- RM Hebrews 13 reminds the church: 7Remember those who led you, who spoke the word of God to you; and considering the result of their conduct, imitate their faith. 8Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever. 9Do not be carried away by varied and strange teachings; for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, through which those who were so occupied were not benefited.… If we truly believe in His word then He has not and will not change. Why would we NOT continue to speak this truth 2000 years later. Are the 10 Commandments irrelevant in society too? Can you only imagine if society followed the 10 Commandments? Simple acts of kindness and obedience. We are human. We are sinners. We need a savior. And I THANK God my Savior does NOT change. I take great comfort in that.
- BP Scripture has to be given context...all of the Epistles were written in a particular time and in a particular place and addressing a specific issue...can you imagine if someone just opened your email and picked something to read with no context? Now, the Bible is sacred...the Holy Spirit was involved in the Canon being decided upon, so we know it's not just a random collection of stories and letters...it was not chosen randomly from someone's inbox...but, the Holy Scripture still has context. To just quote back texts, or "letters from 2,000 years ago" to defend a point is a disservice to the scripture and the argument. Scripture is sacred, but it still must be read in context to get at its intended meaning for the original hearers, and for readers today.
- Andrew Hackman heretic= that other religious person who does not have the same religious thoughts as me.
- RB Agreed. I have always loved Rob Bell but using the word "irrelevant" for the church felt like a blow to the stomach. I love his teachings about journeying with God. His "think out outside the box" abilities have spoken to my soul. But today his words deeply saddened me. There are many things I would like to take out of the Bible for my benefit and homosexuality is one of them. I struggled with the Bible's stance on it. But that being said, for me it's all or nothing.
- EF Andrew Hackman actually, that would be more like "judging" -- kind of like what you do to me that being said, herasy is a serious thing, and it is a serious offense to God. Several religious formed outside of Orthodox Christianity from one belief that was un-Orthodox. Be it marriage, the resurrection of Christ, the authority of Scripture... and several of these teachers that strayed from doctrine lead millions astray. It's a real thing, and it's a serious thing. Much of the NT warns against it. It's not a word I throw around lightly, and certainly not something you use when you simply disagree.
- Andrew Hackman One person's heresy is another's orthodoxy. There are tens of thousands of different strands of Christianity alone (and more historically)... not even getting into the myriads of other religions.... Each, except for a few gracious strands, think all the others are off... not telling the story right, not representing the deity right, not interpreting right, not baptizing right... the list of errors in the "other" group can be quite prodigious. But thankfully, "we" have got our act together.
As an outsider, I find one Christian calling another Christian heretic is truly a case of pot calling kettle black. - EF hi Andrew. I agree, the word can be overused. And I can see why this to outsiders would be confusing. But Orthodox Christianity does exist, and so does heresy, and it's not defined by one person's opinions. Several denominations exist within this scope. It's why there can be unity among diversity. And while this unity will at times look fragmented, we are to guard against heresy. I am speaking to myself, as well! I think we are all prone to it, as we all want our desires to be met. Heresy is something contrary to doctrine, and while for many years I enjoyed Bell's videos, I find his theology (on a number of key issues) outside the scope of Biblical Christianity.
- JL Well if we want to follow a strict biblical definition of marriage we better figure out which of these is correct. Or do we remove those we don't like for our own benefit? https://bobcargill.files.wordpress.com/.../biblical...
- Andrew Hackman And I know many Christians who view your slice of Christianity as being outside of the scope of Jesus Christianity. TomAto/ Tomato, PotAto/Potato. Your saying you are in the right slice is just words... with no more merit or credibility than anyone else's. Everyone lobs volleys as to the points they think are in error within the other's camp... each slice claiming the high ground. You arguing to me that you are in the right slice, while the others are in heresy..... well.... imagine if you were talking to a member of the FLDS church, and the LDS church... and each were trying to explain why the OTHER is wrong in their doctrine. From your perspective, their arguments are irrelevant.
It reminds me of an encounter just before we moved out to Salt Lake. A Jehovah's Witness stopped me as I was getting some Starbucks. We talked for a bit and he closed by asking if we could talk again. I told him that I was moving to Salt Lake City the next week. He said, "Salt Lake City? Don't a lot of Mormons live out there? Aren't they a cult?" I had to repress a grin... His statement was filled with such irony!
Of course, it would be another 8 years or so before I caught the full irony. - EF Andrew Hackman you don't know my slice of Christianity, and that is precisely the point I am making. My slice doesn't matter. Being in line with Scripture does. I seek to confirm my beliefs around His... not the other way around. And just for kicks it might be fun for you to study the beginning of the Jehovah Witness movement. It began from one person having a false belief on the nature of God. It was heresy. That belief continues to lead millions astray to this day. Not Potato/PotAto... life and death.
- Andrew Hackman Whichever slice, it is just one of many... claiming dominance... and declaring it's uniqueness.... just like all the others.
- MG "The Message that points to Christ on the Cross seems like silliness to those hellbent on destruction, but for those on the way of salvation it makes perfect sense." - the first letter from Paul to the church in Corinth written around 55 AD(CE), first chapter, 18th verse, from The Message translation
- Andrew Hackman " but for those on the way of salvation it makes perfect sense. " An argument advanced by Mormons as well. Not to belabor a point, but really... every slice is going to make that argument in some form or fashion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)